Ramanath vs C.Kamala(Deceased)
Judges:
22 January, 2009·This revision has been directed against the Judgment in RCA No.893 of 2004 on the file of VIII Judge(Rent Control Appellate Authority) Court of Small Causes, Chennai which had arisen out of an order in R.C.O.P.No.44 of 2004 on the file of XIV Judge(Rent Controller) Court of Small Causes, Chennai. Th...
Madras High Court
M.K.A.K. Bowsiya Begum vs Mariam Beevi
Judges:
22 January, 2009·The 1st defendant in O.S. No. 8 of 2005 is the appellant before this Court. The suit was filed by the 1st respondent /plaintiff in O.S. No. 8 of 2005 before the Subordinate Judge, Aruppukottai for partition and separate possession of 1/3rd share of the suit property with costs.2. The case of the pla...
Madras High Court
G.Ganeshkumar vs Tamil Nadu Thirukoil ...
Judges:
22 January, 2009·COMMON JUDGMENT M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J The appellants are respondents 1 and 6 to 20 in W.P.No.3693 of 1997. Respondents 6 to 16 had preferred writ appeal 1497 of 2005, respondents 7 to 20, preferred writ appeal No.1561 of 2005 and the first respondent in W.P.No.3693 of 1997, challenging the vires of t...
Madras High Court
K.M.Selvamani vs S.Natarajan
Judges:
22 January, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 26.09.2008 passed by the learned Principal Sub Court, Erode made in I.A.No.65 of 2008 in O.S.No.146 of 2002, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.3. The warp an...
Madras High Court
M/S. Sampat Trading & Co vs M/S.Talayar Tea Company Ltd
Judges:
22 January, 2009·M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J Company Petition No.137 of 2000, which has been filed for winding up the respondent company and for appointment of Official Liquidator, was dismissed by this Court on 25.6.2002 and aggrieved by the same, the applicant has preferred this appeal.2. The facts which are necessary fo...
Madras High Court
M/S.Rds Project Ltd vs Mariyu Abdul Azeez
Judges:
22 January, 2009·These civil revision petitions are preferred against the order dated 04.09.2007 made in I.A.No.9434 of 2007 in O.S.No.4928 of 2005 and the docket order dated 26.04.2007 made in O.S.No.4928 of 2005 passed by the learned I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.Animadverting upon the order dated 0...
Madras High Court
Chennamurthy vs State Rep. By
Judges:
22 January, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) This appeal challenges a judgment of the Sessions Division, Tiruvannamalai, made in S.C.No.124 of 2006 whereby the appellant/A-1 stood charged under Sections 377, 302 and 201 of IPC along with another shown as A-2, and on trial, A-1 was fou...
Madras High Court
M.Chidambaram vs Krishnan
Judges:
22 January, 2009·The civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decreetal orders, dated 22.01.2009, passed in I.A.No.83 of 2008 in O.S.No.141 of 2004, on the file of the Fast Track Court / Additional District Court, Dindigul.2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.141 of 2004, on the file...
Madras High Court
Kaliaperumal vs Kandasamy Padayachi
Judges:
22 January, 2009·The above second appeal has been filed by the defendants in O.S.No.396 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Ulundurpet, who succeeded before the Trial Court but lost before the First Appellate Court in A.S.No.132 of 1997 where-under the learned Additional District Judge, Vill...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs D.Senkathir Selvan
Judges:
22 January, 2009·The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation is on appeal challenging the award dated 13.9.2006 passed in M.C.O.P.No.569 of 1994 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Dharapuram.2. It is a case of injury. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The accident in this case ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.