Subramani @ K.Rukmangan vs Chinnannan
Judges:
19 January, 2009·Anim-adverting upon the order dated 28.4.2008 passed in the memo in O.S.No.200 of 2000 by the District Munsif, Dharmapuri, this civil revision petition is filed.2. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision petiti...
Madras High Court
Periyasamy Gounder vs Thangarasu
Judges:
19 January, 2009·The order passed in I.A.No.146 of 2008 in A.S.No.42 of 2007 is under challenge in this revision.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners.3. I.A.No.146 of 2008 in A.S.No.42 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track Court No.4, Bhavani was filed und...
Madras High Court
Kaliammal vs P. Marimuthu
Judges:
19 January, 2009·The petitioners are defendants in OS.No. 325 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Erode. The respondents filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the defendants on the strength of the sale agreement admittedly executed by these petitioners on 14.12.2006. In the written st...
Madras High Court
Manager vs Vinayagamoorthy
Judges:
19 January, 2009·COMMON JUDGMENT By this common Judgment, all the three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are being disposed.2. These appeals have been filed by the appellant insurance company against the common judgment and three separate decrees dated 19.01.2009, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordinat...
Madras High Court
Devasena Ammal vs K. Rathnavelu Mudaliar
Judges:
19 January, 2009·The unsuccessful defendant in O.S.No.242 of 1992 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Kanchipuram, is the appellant in the above second appeal.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the suit.3. The case of the plaintiff, in-brief, is as fo...
Madras High Court
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
19 January, 2009·The petitioner seeks the issue of a writ of Certiorari to quash the proceedings dated 18.7.2008 in ROC-2192/99 A3 from the Commercial Tax Officer, Madurai, in respect of the tax dues from a defaulter for the period 1993-1994 to 1997-1998.2. It is seen that in respect of the tax arrears of a defaulte...
Madras High Court
Arul vs Vetha Muthu
Judges:
19 January, 2009·The Defendant in O.S.No.60 of 2006 is the appellant before this Court. O.S.No.60 of 2006 has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff for declaration and injunction.2.The case of the plaintiff in O.S.No.60 of 2006 is that the plaintiff and the defendant are brothers. The suit property is in a Grama Na...
Madras High Court
Selvamony vs M.Mercy Roselt
Judges:
19 January, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 08.07.2008 passed by the learned III Asst. City Civil Judge, Chennai, in I.A.No.10437 of 2007 in O.S.No.939 of 2004, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard both sides.3. The facts giving rise to filing of this revision as stood exposited from the records...
Madras High Court
W.S.Seetharam vs V.K.John
Judges:
19 January, 2009·PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the contemnors for having committed contempt of court by flouting the orders of injunction dated 22.07.1996 made in A.No.293 of 1995 in C.S.No.423 of 1995.For Petitioner : Mr.W.S.Seetharam Party-in-person For Resp...
Madras High Court
K.Karuppiah vs B.Kubendran
Judges:
19 January, 2009·This revision has been directed against the Judgment in RCA No.209 of 2002 on the file of VIII Judge(Rent Control Appellate Authority) Court of Small Causes, Chennai which had arisen out of an order in R.C.O.P.No.1005 of 1999 on the file of XI Judge(Rent Controller) Court of Small Causes, Chennai. T...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.