Ramasamy vs Ramachandran
Judges:
11 February, 2009·CMAs These civil miscellaneous appeals have been filed under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2001 made in A.S.No.42 of 2001 and A.S.No.40 of 2001 of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Myladuthurai in setting aside the judgment and...
Madras High Court
S.Meenakshi Sundaram vs The Joint Registrar Of
Judges:
11 February, 2009·The petitioner filed Original Application No.3608 of 1997 challenging the order dated 28.4.1997 by which he was removed from service.2. Admittedly, the petitioner was appointed on 6.3.1969 and later, promoted as Senior Inspector of Co-operative Societies on 20.10.1973. He was also promoted as a Co-o...
Madras High Court
R.Maheswaran vs The District Collector
Judges:
11 February, 2009·The petitioner is the Vice-President of Pannimadai Village Panchayat in Coimbatore District. One Mr.P.Senthil Kumar was the President of the said Panchayat. Unfortunately, in an accident, the President Mr.P.Senthilkumar died. On the demise of Mr.Senthil Kumar, by operation of Section 47(1) of the Ta...
Madras High Court
C.Jacob Johnson vs V.Muthusamy
Judges:
11 February, 2009·The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 28.11.2008 made in E.P.No.113 of 2008 in O.S.No.1538 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.2.The respondent herein filed Suit in O.S.No.1538 of 2004 and prayed for specific performance of an agreement by exe...
Madras High Court
Chinnasamy Gounder vs Balasubramaniyam Gounder
Judges:
11 February, 2009·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite time having been given, no one represented on the side of the respondent.2. The gist and kernel of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run thus:The plaintiff/respo...
Madras High Court
Managing Director vs Minor Yasodha
Judges:
11 February, 2009·The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation is on appeal challenging the award dated 12.2.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.834 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (First Additional District Judge), Krishnagiri.2. It is a case of injury. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The...
Madras High Court
K.Chandran vs Smt.Siriya Pushpam
Judges:
11 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 24.3.2005 passed in I.A.No.79 of 2005 in O.S.No.56 of 2005 by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Chenglepet, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Though the respondent was served and her name also is found printed in the cause list, nonetheless there is no representa...
Madras High Court
Antony D.Vincent vs The Union Of India
Judges:
10 February, 2009·Heard both sides.2. The petitioner was engaged as a Fitter in the second respondent company to attend to their ships. The petitioner being a Fitter was engaged for the purpose of lathe works, pipe works, welding, maintaining generators, main and auxiliary engines of the ship and also to assist the E...
Madras High Court
P. Rengathan vs Mr. Amuruth Bihani
Judges:
10 February, 2009·The Claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. It is a case of injury. The accident, in this case happened on 15.12.1997. The injured claimant Ranganathan, 42 years old, working as a senior officer in a private company suffered fracture and dislocation of the right shoulder....
Madras High Court
Munuswamy vs Elumalai Naicker
Judges:
10 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 28.12.2001 in I.A.No.212 of 2001 in O.S.No.89 of 2001 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Arakkonam as confirmed in CMA No.1 of 2002 dated 17.09.2007 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard both sides...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.