G.Ravichandran vs K.Jayachandran
Judges:
18 February, 2009·These civil revision petitions are preferred against the order dated 28.01.2008 made in I.A.Nos.52 and 53 of 2008 in O.S.No.117 of 2007 passed by the learned District Munsif, Tirupur.Animadverting upon the order dated 28.01.2008 made in I.A.Nos.52 and 53 of 2008 in O.S.No.117 of 2007 passed by the l...
Madras High Court
Marayal vs Lakshmi
Judges:
18 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 23.2.2007 passed in I.A.No.704 of 2006 in O.S.No.49 of 2004 by the District Munsif, Gobichettipalayam, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. The epitome of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition...
Madras High Court
The Managing Direcgtor vs Chenniapaiyan
Judges:
18 February, 2009·The Transport corporation has filed this appeal challenging the award dated 26.3.2007 passed in M.C.O.P. No.50 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Fast Track Court No.II), Tindivanam.2. It is a case of injury. The accident in this case happened on 20.10.2004. The injured cla...
Madras High Court
Balagurusamy Nadar vs Chinna Mariappan
Judges:
17 February, 2009·The plaintiff in O.S.No.158 of 1993 is the appellant before this Court.2.The suit in O.S.No158 of 1993 was filed by the plaintiff for declaration to declare that the second item of the suit schedule property belongs to him and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant in the suit from int...
Madras High Court
Nachammal vs Chellappa Gounder
Judges:
17 February, 2009·Despite printing the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no representation for the petitioners. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent.2. The epitome of relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run th...
Madras High Court
V.Subramanian vs S.Jayakumar
Judges:
17 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 21.6.2007 passed in I.A.No.746 of 2006 in O.S.No.330 of 2004 by the District Munsif, Arani, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. A 'resume' of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition, would run thus:-The pet...
Madras High Court
Narayanasamy Naidu vs Sukumaran
Judges:
17 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 02.09.2005, passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Walajapet, Vellore District in I.A.No.311 of 2004 in O.S.No.218 of 1998, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Both sides called absent.3. A 'resume' of facts which are absolutely necessa...
Madras High Court
Managing Director vs G.Sakuntala
Judges:
17 February, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for caveators/respondents 1 and 2.2. Under this revision, the order passed in M.P.No.5436 of 2008 in M.C.O.P.No.1387 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/III Judge, Court of Small ...
Madras High Court
Venkatachalam vs Pazhani
Judges:
17 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated dated 7.8.2008 passed in I.A.No.2746 of 2007 in O.S.No.51 of 1997 by the I Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. A summation and summarisation of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revi...
Madras High Court
A.G. Rajan vs The Central Administrative ...
Judges:
17 February, 2009·P.K. MISRA, J The present petitioner filed O.A.No.399 of 2008 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, (hereinafter referred to as "The Tribunal") for quashing the circulars dated 5.3.2008 and 31.5.2008 and consequently to direct the respondents to conduct departmental promotional e...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.