Mangayarkarasi vs Maheswaran
Judges:
05 February, 2009·Inveighing the order dated 14.08.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet in I.A.No.95 of 2007 in HMOP No.38 of 2006, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite notice, none appeared on behalf of the respondent.3. A summarisation ...
Madras High Court
M. Muthukrishnan vs Ethirajulu
Judges:
05 February, 2009·This revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the order in I.A.No.882 of 2003 in O.S.No.227 of 1981 dated 17.7.2006, rejecting the review application seeking review of the final decree passed in I.A.No.752 of 1988 dated 1.3.1990.2. The first respondent...
Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs N.Saravana Pandian
Judges:
05 February, 2009·This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 14.3.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.94 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Aruppukottai.2. The grounds, based on which the judgment and decree of the Tribunal, dated 14.3.2006, has been challenged, are th...
Madras High Court
M.Boominathan vs The Returning Officer For The
Judges:
05 February, 2009·The petitioner, Thiru M.Boominathan, belongs to Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, a recognised State party in the State of Tamil Nadu. He was chosen as a candidate from the said party to contest the election for No.144, Madurai East Assembly Constituency held during May, 2006. He filed his nom...
Madras High Court
Venkatesan vs M.K.V.Kandasamy Nadar
Judges:
05 February, 2009·The appellant is claimant in M.C.O.P.No.156 of 1997 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Judge), Chidambaram. He filed the petition claiming compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in the road traffic accident which happened on 22.04.1996.2. In the petition...
Madras High Court
John C.Christian vs R.Adhikesavan
Judges:
04 February, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 05.09.2008, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Chengalpattu, in I.A.Nos.315, 407 and 408 of 2008 respectively in O.S.No.78 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Despi...
Madras High Court
Malarmani vs The Tahsildar
Judges:
04 February, 2009·P r a y e r : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant separate patta in Survey Nos.314/2A, 314/4B1A, of Aliyanilai Village, Aranthangi Taluk and as per the family arrangement Muchalika dated ...
Madras High Court
Madurai Municipal Corporation vs Allavudeen
Judges:
04 February, 2009·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award made in M.C.O.P.No.617 of 2008, dated 04.02.2009, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – Additional District and Sessions Judge – Fast Track Court No. 3, Madurai. The appellant herein is the respondent and the respondents ...
Madras High Court
S.Priya vs K.Satish Kumar
Judges:
04 February, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 25.07.2008, passed by the learned I Additional Family Court, Chennai, in I.A.No.2794 of 2007 in O.P.No.725 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Both sides called absent.3. The nutshell facts which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposa...
Madras High Court
Elango vs Rajendiran
Judges:
04 February, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 20.08.2008, passed by the learned II Additional District Munsif, Vriddhachalam, in I.A.No.2682 of 2007 in O.S.No.643 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. How...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.