M.Joseph Rathinasamy vs The Commissioner
Judges:
23 December, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner has stated that he is the managing Director of M/s.Germanus Properties (P) Ltd. As per the decision of the board of directors, the petitioner had purchased 35 cents of vaca...
Madras High Court
Bombay Tool Centre vs Official Trustee Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
23 December, 2009·AND M.M. SUNDRESH, J.kb O.S. A.NOS.406 TO 408 OF 2009 AND 412 TO 416 OF 2009 23.12.2009...
Madras High Court
M/S.M.K.Press vs M/S.Robel G.M.B.H & Co
Judges:
23 December, 2009·The plaintiffs in O.S.No.99 of 1997 are the appellants herein.2.The plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,21,394.91/- from the defendants. The plaintiffs are sister concerns, owned by one T.S.Krishna Rao. The first plaintiff is doing business in printing and block making and the 2nd plaintiff...
Madras High Court
M.Kalaiyalagan vs The Regional Director Of ...
Judges:
23 December, 2009·Prayer in W.P(MD)No.4859 of 2008: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of transfer passed by the 1st respondent, in Na.Ka.No.3275/2008/A2, date...
Madras High Court
The Land Acquisition Officer vs Radhakrishnan Chetty
Judges:
23 December, 2009·13. The reasons given for the principle that price fetched for small plots cannot form safe basis for valuation of large tracts of land, according to cases referred to above, are that substantial area is used for development of sites like laying out roads, drains sewers, water and electricity lines ...
Madras High Court
M/S. Kgeyes Residency P. Ltd vs M/S. Rukmani Road Ishwarya
Judges:
23 December, 2009·(Judgment was delivered by PRABHA SRIDEVAN, J) The appellant filed an application for rejection of plaint. This was dismissed . Therefore, this appeal has been filed.2. The facts in brief are as follows:-(i) The first respondent is an association of nine owners of the nine apartments in plot No.48, ...
Madras High Court
M.Kalaiyalagan vs The Regional Director Of ...
Judges:
23 December, 2009·Prayer in W.P(MD)No.4859 of 2008: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of transfer passed by the 1st respondent, in Na.Ka.No.3275/2008/A2, date...
Madras High Court
Kings India Chemicals ... vs The District Collector
Judges:
23 December, 2009·D.MURUGESAN, J.Both the writ appeal and the writ petition raise the following issues for consideration:-"(a) Whether a resolution passed by a Village Panchayat could be reconsidered at the request of the members of the council? and(b) If so, whether this Court could issue directions to the council n...
Madras High Court
S.Somasundaram vs The Assistant Director Of
Judges:
23 December, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU,J) Since common issues are involved in all these writ petitions, they were all heard together and disposed of by means of the following common order.2,The petitioners were originally appointed as Section Writers in the Revenue Department, except the petiti...
Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu State Transport vs Thairiyam
Judges:
23 December, 2009·The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/respondent against the Award and Decree dated 22.01.2003, made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.25 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub-ordinate Judge, Nagapattinam, awarding a compensation of Rs.49,500/- with...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.