S.P.Arockiadass vs S.P.Rajan
Judges:
17 December, 2009·The petitioner/defendant has projected this Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 20.02.2007 in I.A.No.8138 of 2006 in O.S.No.5165 of 2001 passed by the XVII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in dismissing the application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Sections 2 and ...
Madras High Court
S.Geetha Kumari vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
17 December, 2009·(The order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Seeking Writ of Habeas Corpus, for production of her son S.Saravana Prasad, the petitioner Geetha Kumari has brought forth this application.2. The Court heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing fo...
Madras High Court
Rajender Garg vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
17 December, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) The petitioner himself has brought forth this application, seeking for a writ of habeas corpus, for his production before the Court.2. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. As could...
Madras High Court
Karuppan Chettiar vs The Tahsildar
Judges:
17 December, 2009·Heard Mr.S.Ramachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.So.Paramasivam, the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice of the second...
Madras High Court
M/S.Mahavishnu Spinning Mills ... vs Tamil Nadu Electricity ...
Judges:
17 December, 2009·Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned.2. Even though various averments have been made and many grounds had been raised in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned demand notice/bill in respect of ...
Madras High Court
The Additional Deputy Commercial vs The Branch Manager
Judges:
17 December, 2009·As similar issues are arising for consideration in both the writ petitions and since, the reliefs sought for are also similar in nature, a common order is passed by this Court in the above writ petitions.2. It is stated that the second respondent, in W.P.(MD) No.945 of 2008, who is doing business in...
Madras High Court
Chinniah @ Jayaraj vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
17 December, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to a judgment of the Principal Sessions Division, Tiruvallur, made in S.C.No.111 of 2008 whereby the sole accused/appellant stood charged under Sections 450 and 302 of IPC, tried, found guilty as per the charges and awarded 10 ...
Madras High Court
The Management Of Thanjavur vs The Presiding Officer
Judges:
17 December, 2009·Heard both sides.2. These two Writ Petitions have been filed against the same award in I.D.No.17 of 1996 dated 14.11.2002 passed by the Labour Court, Cuddalore. In W.P.No.24050 of 2003, the petitioner is the Management and in W.P.No.37842 of 2003, the petitioner is the Trade Union.3. The dispute rel...
Madras High Court
M.K.S.Sivanandam vs Tiruchirapalli City Corporation
Judges:
17 December, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is carrying on real estate business, having his office at No.150, VI Cross, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirapalli. He had obtained a lay out approval, in resp...
Madras High Court
R.Panjavarnam vs State Represented By
Judges:
17 December, 2009·This Criminal R.C. is filed against the judgment passed in C.A. No.32 of 2009 dated 12.10.2009 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Madurai.2. The Revision Petitioner was working as Nutrition Meal Organiser in West Podumbu Village, Madurai District since 01.02.1982. ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.