Mani (Died) vs T.Jagannathan
Judges:
30 December, 2009·(This case has been heard through video conference) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed challenging the fair and decretal order dated 30.12.2009 passed in MCOP.No.1688 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court – IV, Chennai.2. The case in brief are as follows:On 31.0...
Madras High Court
Chinnarasu vs Peyappa Gounder
Judges:
30 December, 2009·The Petitioner / Defendant has filed this Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 21.08.2009 in R.E.A. No.118 of 2009 in R.E.P.No.97 of 2008 in O.S.No.350 of 2006 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Krishnagiri.2. The Executing Court while passing orders on 21.08.2009 in R.E.A.No.118 o...
Madras High Court
Kattathurai Village Panchayat vs Madhavan Pillai
Judges:
29 December, 2009·S.A.(MD)No.8 of 20111.Abusali2.Madhavan Pillai .. Respondents in S.A.(MD)No.9 of 2011 Common Prayer :Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the common Judgment and Decree dated 29.12.2009 passed in A.S.Nos.8 and 45 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate ...
Madras High Court
Kattathurai Village Panchayat vs Madhavan Pillai
Judges:
29 December, 2009·S.A.(MD)No.8 of 20111.Abusali2.Madhavan Pillai .. Respondents in S.A.(MD)No.9 of 2011 Common Prayer :Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the common Judgment and Decree dated 29.12.2009 passed in A.S.Nos.8 and 45 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate ...
Madras High Court
Kattathurai Village Panchayat vs Madhavan Pillai
Judges:
29 December, 2009·S.A.(MD)No.8 of 20111.Abusali2.Madhavan Pillai .. Respondents in S.A.(MD)No.9 of 2011 Common Prayer :Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the common Judgment and Decree dated 29.12.2009 passed in A.S.Nos.8 and 45 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate ...
Madras High Court
M/S. Kothari Phyto Chemicals ... vs The Superintending Engineer
Judges:
23 December, 2009·Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned.2. Even though various averments have been made and many grounds had been raised in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned demand notice/bill in respect of ...
Madras High Court
Haji Mohammed Raffique vs B.Sivabakkiyam
Judges:
23 December, 2009·The petitioner/plaintiff has filed this Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 05.01.2008 in I.A.No.334 of 2005 in O.S.No.143 of 2001, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.II), Coimbatore, in dismissing the application filed by the revision pe...
Madras High Court
Shuttle Weaves International vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
23 December, 2009·T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.The challenge in this writ petition is to an order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the third respondent, in T.A.No.485/01 dated 21.12.2005. The issue involved in the present writ petition relates to levy of penalty under Section 16(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax ...
Madras High Court
M/S. Rds Projects Limited vs K. Venkat Ramana
Judges:
23 December, 2009·1. The applicant in the contempt petition would state as follows:-a. The applicant filed W.P.No.9210 of 2006 challenging the order of the second respondent, the National Highways Authority of India in its proceedings dated 22.03.2006 whereby the second respondent sought to recover the arrears of ren...
Madras High Court
Vadivu @ Sekar @ Military Sekar vs State By
Judges:
23 December, 2009·(The judgment of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Division, Chengleput, made in S.C.No.34 of 2004 whereby the appellant along with 4 others, stood charged, tried and found guilty under sections 302 r/w 149, 364, 396 and 20...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.