Govindasamy vs Sellamuthu
Judges:
20 August, 2009·The petitioners/petitioners No.2,3,5 to 17/legal representatives of the decree holders/plaintiffs have filed this civil revision petition as against the order dated 17.04.2008 in R.E.A No.39 of 2007 in R.E.P No.38 of 2002 in (O.S.No.893 of 1981 on the file of District Munsif Court Tiruchengode) pass...
Madras High Court
Ponnuswamy Goundar vs Pappathi
Judges:
20 August, 2009·This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 1.12.1993, made in A.S.No.173 of 1993, on the file of the District Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 5.7.1993, made in O.S.No.672 of 1986, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.2. The ...
Madras High Court
V.K. Palanivelu vs The Deputy Director
Judges:
20 August, 2009·The Honourable the Chief Justice Heard Mr. Su. Srinivasan, learned counsel in support of this writ petition. Mr. K. Chandrasekaran, Special Public Prosecutor for C.B.I. Cases appears for the first respondent and Mr. G. Masilamani, learned senior counsel appears along with Mr. K. Ramakrishna Reddy fo...
Madras High Court
Abdul Salam vs Taj Trading Corporation
Judges:
20 August, 2009·The petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to C.C.No.463 of 2003 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and quash the same.2.The facts of the case is as follows:The petitioners are husband and wife. The respondent alleged that M/s.Taj Tradin...
Madras High Court
M. Madhavi vs The Chief Regional Manager
Judges:
20 August, 2009·The petitioner herein made an application to the respondents on 01.08.2009 in pursuant to the publication made on 16.07.2007 for the appointment of retail outlet dealers. Thereafter, the interview was conducted on 14.11.2007 and the petitioner was declared as the first empanelled candidate.2. Howeve...
Madras High Court
Karupiah vs The District Collector
Judges:
20 August, 2009·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2.The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the respondents 5 to 11 from excommunicating the petitioner and his 25 families (pangali) member...
Madras High Court
P.Nagamony vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
20 August, 2009·The petitioner was appointed as Grade II Police Constable (Armed Reserve) in Kanyakumari District on 12.10.1976. He was promoted as Head Constable on 27.11.1984 in Armed Reserve, Nagercoil. On his request, he was transferred to Taluk Police Station as Grade II Police Constable on 06.10.1986. He ...
Madras High Court
S.V.R.Ram Prasad vs N.Ismail
Judges:
20 August, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM,J) This Judgment shall govern these three appeals namely OSA.Nos.298 of 2004 and 77 of 2005 at the instance of the Trustee and OSA.No.76 of 2005 at the instance of the Tenant.2. These appeals have arisen under the following circumstances:(a) An immov...
Madras High Court
Film & Television Producers' vs P.Raghu
Judges:
19 August, 2009·at No.16/153, Habibullah Road Nadigar Sangam Complex T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. .. Appellants in both appeals and Defendants in CS 939/2007 vs1.P.Raghu2.Giridharilal3.R.V.Mani .. Respondents in both appeals and Plaintiffs in CS 939/2007 Original Side Appeals preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 11 of O.S...
Madras High Court
2 The Management Of Tansi vs 2 K.Janardhanam
Judges:
19 August, 2009·Prabha Sridevan, J.The 117 employees who had retired availing the Voluntary Retirement Scheme offered by the appellant-Corporation in the year 1986, preferred a claim petition under <act id=zLGxPokB_szha0nWJ9KD section=33C_2>Section 33C(2) </act>of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on the ground tha...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.