Mariaamal vs Rajiendar Singh ..1St
Judges:
06 April, 2009·Head both sides.2. The revision petitioners/respondents 2 and 3 have preferred this civil revision petition as against the order dated 05.01.2009 in I.A.No.1 of 2009 in O.S.No.1 of 2009 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, granting the relief of ad...
Madras High Court
J.Deivasigamani ..Revision vs M.Jayakumar
Judges:
06 April, 2009·This Revision has been directed the against the order passed in EA.No.6932 of 2007 in EP.No.932 of 2007 in O.S.No.2784 of 1991 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. EA.No.6932 of 2007 in EP.No.932 of 2007 was filed under Section 47 of CPC.2.The grievance of the revision pe...
Madras High Court
M/S.Tna Transport vs Tax Recovery Officer
Judges:
06 April, 2009·Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the pet...
Madras High Court
Anjappa @ Kannappan vs Chinna Reddy
Judges:
06 April, 2009·This revision petition has been directed against the order passed in I.A.No.25 of 2004 in O.S.No.50 of 2004(I.A.No.161 of 2004 in O.S.No.127 of 1996 on the file of Sub Court, Hosur) on the file of the First Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri.2. I.A.No.25 of 2004 in O.S.No.50 of 2004 (I.A.No.161 ...
Madras High Court
R.Anandan vs Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies ...
Judges:
06 April, 2009·COMMON ORDER Though, there are two individual writ petitions filed by the two petitioners, the issues, allegations and the transactions involved are one and the same. Thus, both the writ petitions are disposed of by way of a common order.2/18 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Nos.7148 and 7149 of...
Madras High Court
Mr.J.Chandran vs Mr.N.Manoharan
Judges:
06 April, 2009·The first respondent/caveator/claimant appears through counsel. By consent of both parties, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal.2. The National Insurance Company is on appeal challenging the award dated 28.8.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.116 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims ...
Madras High Court
M.Kuppusami vs M/S.Deccan Finance Limited
Judges:
06 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel on both sides. This Revision has been directed against the order passed in I.A.No.782 of 2007 in O.S.No.39 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram. I.A.No.782 of 2007 was filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1714 days in pre...
Madras High Court
Mr.K.Srinivasan vs Order
Judges:
06 April, 2009·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06.04.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN C. R. P. (NPD) No. 805 of 2009 K.Pazhlanivelu .. Petitioner Vs.Prema @ Rajammal ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition is filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=227>Articl...
Madras High Court
Mr.T.Murugamanickam vs Mr.P.Subramanian
Judges:
06 April, 2009·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.04.2009 CORAM THE HON'BLE JUSTICE Mr.N.PAUL VASATHAKUMAR and THE HON'BLE JUSTICE Mr.N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.5388 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 M.Rajambal .. Petitioner vs The Principal District Judge, Salem District, Salem 636 007 .. Respondent Petit...
Madras High Court
K.Rajendra Kumar vs The Chairman Cum Managing ...
Judges:
06 April, 2009·The petitioner was appointed as Development Officer Grade II on 06.07.194 and was promoted as Grade I with effect from 01.08.1995.While he was working as Development Officer (Admin) the Division Officer Eluru, departmental proceeding was initiated for certain lapses on two 2/26 http://www.judis.nic....
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.