S.Ganesan vs P.Govindaraj
Judges:
18 April, 2009·The revision petitioner/appellant/defendant has filed this civil revision petition praying for issuance of a direction from this Court to be given to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur, to dispose of the I.A.No.482 of 2008 in Unnumbered A.S. of 2008, wit...
Madras High Court
Sivasakthi Threads vs The Commissioner Of Commercial ...
Judges:
18 April, 2009·Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the pet...
Madras High Court
B.Mugilan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
18 April, 2009·This petition has been listed under the caption "For Dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, on an earlier occasion, i.e., on 17.04.2009. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No c...
Madras High Court
Marimuthu vs Rathinam
Judges:
18 April, 2009·The revision petitioner/Plaintiff has projected these two Civil Revision Petitions as against the order dated 29.05.2008 in I.A.Nos 438 and 439 of 2007 in O.S.No.122 of 2004 by the learned additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Court No.1, Tiruchirapallai dismissing the applications fil...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs K.Maragatham
Judges:
17 April, 2009·The State Transport Corporation is on appeal challenging the award dated 14.08.2008 passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.399 of 2006 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Court), Gobichettypalayam.2. It is a case of fatal accident. The accident in this case happened on 31.8.2006. ...
Madras High Court
This Petition Has Been Filed Under ... vs Unknown
Judges:
17 April, 2009·This Petition has been filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 6 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules to grant Succession Certificate in favour of the petitioner.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the deceased P.Seethalakshmi ordinarily resid...
Madras High Court
M.Goutham Chand vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
17 April, 2009·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.ssv...
Madras High Court
V.Ponnaiah vs State Rep. By
Judges:
17 April, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM,J) Seeking a writ of habeas corpus, one Mr.V.Ponnaiah has brought forth this application.2.The petitioner is present in Court along with his counsel. The alleged detenue is also present.3.The case of the petitioner as could be seen from the averments ma...
Madras High Court
M/S. Screen Entertainment vs Union Of India
Judges:
17 April, 2009·In both the appeals as common order dated 26th Aug., 2008 passed by learned single Judge is under challenge and common question of law involved and arising out of common facts, they were heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. The appellants approached the writ court by filing two ...
Madras High Court
R.Arulanandam vs K.Mani
Judges:
17 April, 2009·This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2000 made in A.S.No.205 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court, Karur reversing the judgment and decree dated 26.02.1999 made in O.S.No.434 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur.2....
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.