Essakkiammal vs State Represented By
Judges:
20 April, 2009·(Order of the Court was delivered by M. CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to the order of detention passed by the first respondent in M.H.S.Condfl.No.96 of 2008 dated 24.06.2008, whereby the husband of the petitioner viz., Essakimuthu was ordered to be detained under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of D...
Madras High Court
S.Xavier vs The Deputy Inspector General Of ...
Judges:
20 April, 2009·The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition, challenging the orders of the Disciplinary Authority, the first respondent herein in P.R.No.3 of 2003 and the Appellate Authority in the proceedings C2/10020/04 dated 04.11.2004, whereby and where-under, the Disciplinary Authority has impose...
Madras High Court
Mrs.Mala Sundar vs The Commissioner
Judges:
20 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the first respondent is directed to dis...
Madras High Court
Chelliah Thevar vs State Represented By
Judges:
20 April, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J) This Writ Application challenges the order of the first respondent made in M.H.S.Confdl No.123/2008 dated 21.8.2008 whereby the petitioner's son was ordered to be detained under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of ...
Madras High Court
Balamani vs S.Balasundaram
Judges:
20 April, 2009·This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiffs, animadverting upon the judgement and decree dated 05.07.2006 passed by the Principal District Judge, Erode, in A.S.No.92 of 2005, reversing the judgement and decree dated 18.11.2005 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Bhavani, in O.S.No.9 of 2003. For t...
Madras High Court
Mr.S.V.L.S.Ranga Rao vs The Secretary To The Government
Judges:
20 April, 2009·By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition challenging the proceedings of the second respondent dated 07.08.2008 with a further direction directing the respondents to treat the deed of release executed by...
Madras High Court
V.M.H.Nazeer Ahamed vs The Chief Engineer (Building)
Judges:
20 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, challenging the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 12.8.2004, and for ...
Madras High Court
Selvam vs Vajjiravely Mudaliar
Judges:
20 April, 2009·This second appeal has been filed by the the defendants 5 to 8, animadverting upon the judgement and decree dated 30.6.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, No.III, Chengalpattu at Poonamallee, in A.S.No.46 of 2004, confirming the judgement and decree dated 27.4.200...
Madras High Court
P.S. Mohan Sha vs P.S. Parameswaran Sha
Judges:
20 April, 2009·The petitioners are defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.4434 of 2000 on the file of the XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The first respondent filed the suit for Partition and separate possession of 1/5th share in the 'A' and 'B' Schedule properties. Pending trial of the suit, at the instance...
Madras High Court
Veeran @ Veerasamy vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2009·The accused 1 and 2 who were charged and tried for an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC before the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur in S.C.No.40/2001 and found not guilty of the said offence, have come forward with the present appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.