Workers Employed In 32 Textile ... vs Management Of Dhanalakshmi Mills ...
Judges: R Iyer
29 April, 1960·Ramachandra Iyer, J. 1. Sometime in 1952, there was a dispute between the management of 32 mills in Coimbatore and the workmen employed therein in regard to the bonus payable to the latter (or the years 1919, 1950 and 1951, By C. O. Ms. No. 2019 dated 9th of May 1952, the State Government referred t...
Madras High Court
In Re: Seeni Ammal vs Unknown
Judges: Ramaswami, Anantanarayanan
27 April, 1960·Ramaswami, J. 1. This is a revision petition preferred1 against the acquittal of the accused in S. C. No. 136 of 1959 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions-Judge of Tirunelveli. That prosecution related to the murder of a man named Ramaswami Naicker, who undoubtedly received gunshot injurie...
Madras High Court
B. Matha Gowder vs M.S. Kada Gowder
Judges: P Rajamannar, Veeraswami
26 April, 1960·Rajamannar, C.J. 1. This is an appeal against the order of the learned District Judge, Coimbatore, in I. A. No. 433 of 1954 on his file in O. P. No. 225 of 1952 on the file of the High Court, Madras.2. Kundah Trading Co., Ltd., was directed to be wound up by an order of this court dated 22-9-1953 in...
Madras High Court
S.P.L.P. Narayanan Chettiar vs M.A.R. Annamalai Chettiar
Judges: P Rajamannar, G Pillai, Veeraswami
26 April, 1960·Ganapatia Pillai, J. 1. The following three questions have been referred to this Full Bench by Somasundaram and Ramaswami, JJ. :-1. Whether a debt incurred before 1-10-1937 is not a debt payable by an agriculturist at the commencement of this Act (22-3-1038) within the scope of Section 7 of the Madr...
Madras High Court
Thirumalasubbu Chettiar vs Smt. Rajammal
Judges: P Rajamannar, Veeraswami
26 April, 1960·Rajamannar, C.J. 1. This appeal originally came on for hearing before Subrahmanyara J. who considered that it was necessary to have an authoritative ruling by a Bench of this court on the question which arose in the case. The facts have been set out by the learned Judge in his order of reference and...
Madras High Court
Jawaharlal Nehru vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
26 April, 1960·R. MAHADEVAN, J The petitioner has filed this writ petition, as a Public Interest Litigation, praying to issue appropriate directions to the respondents to evolve a transparent mechanism for campus placement (recruitment) process on behalf of the Indian and Multi National Companies in the Government...
Madras High Court
Jawaharlal Nehru vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
26 April, 1960·R. MAHADEVAN, J The petitioner has filed this writ petition, as a Public Interest Litigation, praying to issue appropriate directions to the respondents to evolve a transparent mechanism for campus placement (recruitment) process on behalf of the Indian and Multi National Companies in the Government...
Madras High Court
Kalimuthu Servai And Ors. vs Govindaswami Servai And Anr.
Judges: Anantanarayanan
26 April, 1960·Anantanaryanan, J. 1.This proceeding in revision is directed against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonaro in O. P. No. 5 of 1959, permitting the petitioner in the court below to sue in forma pauperis.2. The learned Subordinate Judge correctly stated that the short point for cons...
Madras High Court
A. Kuppuswami Gounder vs Alagammal
Judges: Anantanarayanan
25 April, 1960·Anantanarayanan, J. 1. This is an appeal by the petitioner in the court below who applied under <act id=YbGwPokB_szha0nW8c-r section=10_1>Section 10(1) </act>of the Hindu Marriage Act, XXV of 1955, for a decree for judicial separation from his wife (respondent) on the ground of desertion by her for ...
Madras High Court
Associated Publishers (Madras), ... vs K. Bashyam Alias 'Arya' And Anr.
Judges:
22 April, 1960·P.V. Rajamannar, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from the Judgment of Balakrishna Ayyar, J, in a suit C.S. No. 19 of 1952, filed on the Original Side of this Court by the first respondent (who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff) against two defendants namely: (1) TheAssociated Publishers (Ma...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.