Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Madhu Kumar @ Madhu And Others vs Smt Rangamma W/O Late And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2150/2017 BETWEEN:
1. MADHU KUMAR @ MADHU S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS OCC: COOLI 2. SARALA D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 3. VAGEESH S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 4. DROWPADI D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA ALL ARE R/AT HOLEHONNUR VILLAGE BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 227 5. SAVITRI W/O MANJUNATH D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O NEW TOWN BHADRAVATHI TOWN – 577 301 6. PADMAVATHY W/O NAGABHUSHANA D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/O HOSAMANE BHADRAVATHI TOWN – 577 301 … APPELLANTS (BY SRI M.R.HIREMATHAD, ADV.) AND:
1. SMT.RANGAMMA W/O LATE H.T.SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS HOUSEWIFE 2. SMT.YASHODHAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS HOUSEWIFE 3. ULLAS S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS STUDENT 4. UMESHA S/O LATE SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS BUSINESS 5. SHIVANNA S/O LATE SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BUSINESS 6. RANGAIAH S/O LATE SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS BUSINESS ALL ARE R/O VIJAYANAGARA HOLEHONNUR, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 271 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.M.THIPPERUDRASWAMY, ADV. FOR C/R1 TO R6) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.06.2017 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI, IN R.A.NO. 80/2013, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.06.2013 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL JMFC, BHADRAVATHI IN O.S.NO.410/2011.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned Counsel for the appellants files memo for dismissal of the appeal as not pressed. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal, I.A.Nos.1/2017 and 2/2017 do not survive for consideration and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Madhu Kumar @ Madhu And Others vs Smt Rangamma W/O Late And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • K S Mudagal Regular