Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Madhav Gupta vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30558 of 2019 Applicant :- Madhav Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 12 of 2019, under Sections 392 & 411 I.P.C., P.S. Kuthondh, District Jalaun.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused was not named in the FIR. His name has surfaced during the confessional statement of the co-accused namely Mayank alias Maunu Gautam and Ankit alias Nitin Alias Fauzi Yadav. He submitted that the accused is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He next submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered either from the possession of the present applicant or on his pointing out. He further submitted that the co-accused Mayank alias Maunu Gautam and Ankit alias Nitin Alias Fauzi Yadav who were having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 14.03.2019 & 26.04.2019 passed by the another Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 11003 of 2019 & 17762 of 2019 respectively.
He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of
U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22. The accused is languishing in jail since 11.03.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Madhav Gupta be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.
iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 Shanu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Madhav Gupta vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar Mishra