Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Madan Singh vs Manager Ruhelkhand Depot

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31685 of 2003 Petitioner :- Madan Singh Respondent :- Regional Manager Ruhelkhand Depot, Bareilly And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Vaish Counsel for Respondent :- Samir Sharma,Nripendra Mishra,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari set aside the impugned order dated 1.2.2003 passed by the respondent no. 2 (Annexure-4).
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to provide the salary to the petitioner without making any recovery from his salary."
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Sri N. Mishra, Advocate is present for respondents.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Madan Singh vs Manager Ruhelkhand Depot

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • R K Vaish