Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Macherla Rajyalaxmi vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Telangana|16 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P. NO. 2367 OF 2014 Date of Judgment: 16.6.2014 Between:
Smt. Macherla Rajyalaxmi …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P. NO. 2367 OF 2014 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner states that she is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.21-00 guntas in Sy.Nos. 122, 123, 126, 127 and 128 situated at Timmapur Haveli, Hanmakonda Mandal of Warangal district having purchased under a sale deed and she filed an application in Form No.X under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short “the Act”) for grant of pattadar passbook and title deed and it was pending with the fourth respondent since 1996 in File No. B2/216/96, neither pattadar passbook nor title deed was issued to the petitioner and even she filed a representation dated 3.5.2013, which was endorsed by the third respondent for its examination. Alleging inaction on the part of the respondents, the present writ petition is filed.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the aforesaid land is part of tenancy land and involved in Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act. It is also stated that the petitioner’s application under Section 5-A of the Act in respect of the aforesaid land was rejected by the then Tahsildar, Hanmakonda on 20.12.2006. Further the Government, by its G.O.Ms.No. 1328, Revenue (SS- 1) Department, dated 3.11.2010, extended three months’ time for receiving Form X claims. Even that time has also expired long back and at present there is no such scheme/programme for regulation of ordinary sale deed for issue of pattadar pass books/title deeds.
In view of the above specific stand on the part of the respondents, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief as prayed for in this writ petition. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate other remedies in accordance with law, if so advised.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dt. 16.6.2014 KR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Macherla Rajyalaxmi vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
16 June, 2014
Judges
  • Vilas V Afzulpurkar