IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA W.P.No.55375/2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
M.V.Mahesh, S/o Vasantha Kumar, Aged about 37 years, Businessman, Mahesh Nilaya, Narasingha Rao Road, Basavanahalli Extension, Chikmagalur City – 577 101. … PETITIONER (By Sri Vighneshwar S.Shastri, Adv.) AND:
1. Smt. Nandini Saraswathi, W/o Rajashekar, D/o Vasantha Kumar, 45 years, Housewife, D.No.2946, New Extension, 1st Main Road, Kolar – 577 101.
2. Smt. Hemamalini, W/o Rajendra Kumar Arya, D/o Vasantha Kumar, 41 years, Housewife, R/o 283, 27th Block, Jeevan Surabhi Apartments, 10th ‘B’ Cross, 1st Phase, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore – 563 101.
3. Smt. M.V.Vaishali, W/o Jadhav, D/o Vasantha Kumar, 37 years, Housewife, M.S.Raman Coffee Works, V.V.Road, K.R.Nagar Post, Mysore District – 570 001.
4. M.V.Raghavendra, S/o Vasantha Kumar, 35 years, Sufalan Seeds Co., No.12, SS Temple Gowda, V.V.Puram, Bangalore – 563 101.
5. M.V.Eshwararaj, S/o Vasantha Kumar, 32 years, Sufalan Seeds Co., No.12, SS Temple Road, V.V.Puram, Bangalore – 563 101. … RESPONDENTS (By Sri B.V.Manjunatha, Adv.) This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 06.11.2015 passed on IA No.10 as per Annexure-E and consequential supplementary preliminary decree dated 16.11.2015 passed in as per Annexure-F passed in FDP No.34 of 2013 on the file of Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Chikmagalur.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing ‘B’ Group, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER 1. Defendant in FDP No.34/2013 on the file of I Addl.
Senior Civil Judge, Chikamagaluru, has come up in this writ petition impugning the order dated 06.11.2015 passed on IA No.10 and the consequential supplementary preliminary decree dated 16.11.2015.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration this day, the stage of the proceedings in FDP No.34/2013 is looked into in the website of Chickmagaluru District Court. It is seen that FDP No.34/2013 has already been disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition as the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE KK