Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

M Sundararami Reddy vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

High Court Of Telangana|09 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WP .NO: 230 of 2011 Between:
M. Sundararami Reddy S/o. M. Dasaratharami Reddy R/o. C/37, II Floor, Near Park, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad – 38.
AND
1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by the Zonal . Petitioner Commissioner, West Zone, Sherilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.
2 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-12, GHMC, West Zone, Sherilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.
. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to demolish the structures raised in plots Nos.152 and 153 of Survey Nos.157 and 158, situated at Miyapur Village, Sherlingampally Mandal of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation as being arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable, apart from being in gross violation of principles of natural justice and issue a consequential direction, directing the respondents not to demolish the structures.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 12-01-2011 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Laxma Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Dr. Y. Padmavathy, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents, the Court made the following ORDER:
Despite time having been granted, Dr. Y. Padmavathy, Learned Standing Counsel requests further time to file counter-affidavit.
Post on 09.06.2014.
In case no counter-affidavit is filed by then, respondents 1 and 2 shall be personally present in Court on 09.06.2014 at 10.30 A.M.
Dr. Y. Padmavathy, Learned Standing Counsel is present in Court and undertakes to inform the respondents 1 and 2 of their obligations under this order.
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 The Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, West Zone, Sherilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. (By Spl. Messenger)
2 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-12, GHMC, West Zone, Sherilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. (By Spl. Messenger)
3 One CC to Sri P. Laxma Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
4 One CC to Dr. Y. Padmavathi, Standing Counsel (By Spl. Messenger)
5 One Spare Copy. nnr HIGH COURT RR,J DATE: 2-6-2014 NOTE: In case no counter-affidavit is filed, For appearance on 9-6-2014 at 10.30 AM ORDER W.P.NO. 230 OF 2011 DIRECTION HIGH COURT Nnr Date of Drafting : 3-6-2014 RR,J DATE: 2-6-2014 NOTE: In case no counter-affidavit is filed, For appearance on 9-6-2014 at 10.30 AM ORDER W.P.NO. 230 OF 2011 DIRECTION
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M Sundararami Reddy vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
09 June, 2014
Judges
  • Ramesh Ranganathan