IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.21401 OF 2019 (GM-ST/RN) BETWEEN:
SMT. M.SATHYAMMA W/O SRI KRISHNAPPA.C. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.3, 4TH CROSS, DVG ROAD RAMAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT NAGASHETTYHALLI BENGALURU-560 094 … PETITIONER (BY SRI KESHAVA MURTHY B, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS KANDAYA BHAVAN, 8TH FLOOR K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR SS COMPLEX, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT M.B.ROAD, KOLAR TOWN KOLAR-563 101 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION NEAR COURT CIRCLE KOLAR-563 101 5. TAHASILDAR MALUR TALUK MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA MASTI ROAD, MALUR TOWN KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130 6. SMT. ANASUYAMMA W/O SRI ASHWATH NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT KODIHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560 087 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SRIDHAR.N. HEGDE, HCGP FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 - THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS, BENGALURU, TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.03.2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND THEREBY DIRECTING HIM TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO DELETE THE FABRICATED ENTRIES MADE IN THE REGISTERED BOOK-I AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri. Keshava Murthy B, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Sridhar N. Hegde, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to dispense with the service of notice on respondent No.6.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, service of notice on respondent No.6 is dispensed with.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 19.03.2019 vide Annexure-A.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 19.03.2019 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE cp*