Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M S Sanaulla vs Abdul Rehaman And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|19 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.26451/2017 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
M.S. SANAULLA S/O. MOHAMMED BASHA SAB, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. 2ND CROSS, TANK MOHALLA, SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI P.N. HARISH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. ABDUL REHAMAN S/O. LATE ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 2. FAIROZ A S/O. LATE ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS, MALLIKARJUNA NAGARA, HONNALI ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201. ... RESPONDENTS (BY R-1 AND R-2 SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER - 2 -
DATED 25.03.2017 PASSED BY LEARNED II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA IN O.S.NO.83/2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 25/03/2017 in O.S.No.83/2015 on the file of II Addl. Civil Judge, Shivamogga ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.83/2015 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M S Sanaulla vs Abdul Rehaman And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
19 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha