IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6969 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
1. M R NARASINGH S/O LATE RAJARAMA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 21/69, 12TH A CROSS, GUBBANNA LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGLAURU - 10.
2. SMT. KAUSALAY BAI B K W/O M.R.NARASINGH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO. 21/69, 12TH A CROSS GUBBANNA LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 10.
3. HARSHA VARDHAN SINGH N S/O M.R.NARASINGH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT NO. 21/69, 12TH A CROSS GUBBANNA LAYOUT, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 10.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: KAMALESHWARA POOJARY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAGADI ROAD POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 23.
2. SMT. TULASABAI W/O LATE RAJA RAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, NO. 510, 10TH ‘F’ MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 10.
... RESPONDENTS (By Sri.I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AS ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT/MAGADI ROAD POLICE SUB- INSPECTOR IN CR.NO.397/2015 DATED 29.10.2015 U/S 420 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF III A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN CR.NO.397/2015 AS NOT SUSTAINABLE.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Office to show the name of learned SPP-II appearing for respondent No.1.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo.
Memo reads as under:
“The undersigned Counsel for the Petitioners most respectfully submits that the Respondent Police has conducted an investigation and found that the Petitioners-Accused are innocent and accordingly filed ‘B’ Report before the Hon’ble Magistrate Court.
Wherefore, the petitioners most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court may kindly dispose of the above Criminal Petition in terms of this Memo filed by the petitioners in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, petition does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2016 does not survive for consideration and the same is also dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Bss