Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M Philominraj vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Secretary To Government And Others

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.8517 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.10001 of 2004 M.Philominraj ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2. The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
3. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai.
4. The Sub Registrar, Tuticorin Keelur, Tuticorin Taluk & District. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent comprised in Na.Mu.Ka.vu.ni.4/7295/2003 dated 27.11.2003 and quash the same and direct the 4th respondent to receive and register the documents produced by the petitioner with respect of Survey No.41/1A1A1A1 part to an extent of 87 ½ cents, survey No.22/1, 22/2, 22/3 to an extent of 40 cents in Tuticorin Village, Survey No.198/5 to an extent of 34 cents, survey No.191/5 to an extent of 28 cents, survey No.80/5A, 80/5B, 80/5C, 80/6 to an extent of 83 ½ cents in Mappillaiyurani Village, within the Sub Registration District of Tuticorin Keelur, Tuticorin taluk & District.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kadarkarai For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
29.06.2017 pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To
1. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2. The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
3. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Santhome, Chennai.
4. The Sub Registrar, Tuticorin Keelur, Tuticorin Taluk & District.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri W.P.No.8517 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.10001 of 2004 29.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M Philominraj vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Secretary To Government And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani