Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr M Pape Gowda Superintendent Karnataka Forest vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|21 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.6230 OF 2019 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN:
MR. M. PAPE GOWDA SUPERINTENDENT KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CHIKKAMAGALURU DIVISION R/AT NO.25, 11TH B CROSS JAKKUR LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 064. ... PETITIONER (BY MS. TESSLYN ANTONY, ADV. FOR SRI NITIN A.M., ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
2. DEPARTMENT OF FOREST REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560 003.
3. KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VANA VIKAS, 1ST FLOOR 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003.
4. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR 36, BELLARY ROAD DENA BANK COLONY GANGA NAGAR BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560 032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, A.G.A.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE INTO THE ILLEGAL ALLOTMENT OF LAND IN SY NO.32, BYGADAHALLI VILLAGE, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF FOREST LAWS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ms. Tesslyn Antony, learned counsel for Sri Nitin A.M., learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Vikaykumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4.
2. In view of the objection raised by Sri Vijaykumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4 as well as the Registry, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Sd/- JUDGE ST
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr M Pape Gowda Superintendent Karnataka Forest vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
21 February, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe