IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.NO.13216/2017 (LB RES) BETWEEN M MADHUKUMAR S/O SHESHACHARYALU AGE 58 YEARS, SDVT PRIEST QUARTERS SG S ASRAMA MYSURU - 570 025.
(BY SRI N SURESHA, ADV. - ABSENT) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001 2. MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NEW SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, DEVARAJA MOHALLA MYSURU - 570001 3. THE DISTRICT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOVT., OFFICE BUILDING, NO 12, NEAR MAHARANI COLLEGE CHAMRAJA MOHALLA MYSURU – 570005.
... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO REGULARIZE THE PETITION SCHEDULE AS PER ANNEXURE-G DTD:10.12.2016 INSOFAR PETITIONER IS CONCERNED ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government takes notice for the respondents.
2. Case is called. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Similar writ petitions in W.P.No.12057/2017 and other connected matters were listed on 27.05.2019. The said matters came to be rejected.
4. The instant writ petition being of similar nature and similar relief being sought and there being no compliance of office objections despite several and repeated opportunities being granted, it appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
5. There being no merit in the writ petition, no purpose would be served in retaining the matter. Accordingly, petition stands rejected.
Sd/- JUDGE KK CT-HR