Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M Krishnan And Others vs The District Collector And Others

Madras High Court|24 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.02.2017 CORAM :
The Hon'ble MR.HULUVADI G.RAMESH, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.4841 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.5062 of 2017 1.M.Krishnan 2.K.Hari Kumar 3.K.Prabakaran .. Petitioners -vs-
1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
2. The Commissioner, Poonamallee Municipality, Ponnamallee, Thiruvallur Dt.
3. The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Thiruvallur Dt. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 14.02.2017 passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka. No.1431/2016/F1 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from initiating proceedings for eviction against the petitioners from their Grama Natham properties comprised in S.Nos.246/2, 246/3 & 246/4 in Kattupakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District.
For Petitioners : Mrs.Chitra Sampath Senior Counsel for M/s.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar Addl. G.P. for R1 & R3 Mr.R.Sivakumar for R2 * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice) Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for respondent 1 and 3 and Mr.R.Sivakumar, learned counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent.
2. Aggrieved by the notice dated 14.2.2017 directing the petitioners to remove the encroachments within seven days, the present petition is filed on the grounds that the building has been constructed after obtaining planning permission from the competent authority and that the second respondent is not empowered to issue the impugned notice. It is further alleged that the survey numbers specified in the impugned notice are not in their possession and, therefore, the notice issued is under a mistaken identity.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we direct the respondent/authorities to re-survey the property in question and thereafter proceed in accordance with law, after issuing a fresh notice, in case any encroachments are found. Till such exercise is done, the respondent/ authorities shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner.
The petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : No Internet : Yes sasi (H.G.R., ACJ.) (M.K.K.S., J.) 24.02.2017 To
1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
2. The Commissioner, Poonamallee Municipality, Ponnamallee, Thiruvallur Dt.
3. The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Poonamallee, Thiruvallur Dt.
The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice and K.kalyanasundaram, J.
(sasi) W.P.No.4841 of 2017 24.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M Krishnan And Others vs The District Collector And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 February, 2017
Judges
  • Huluvadi G Ramesh
  • K Kalyanasundaram