IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 49 of 2016 (dec/inj) Between:
M. G. NAGAPRASAD AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF M.A. GOPALAPADMANABHA SETTY, RESIDING GANDHIPET, HULIYAR, C.N. HALLI, TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 577 218.
(BY SRI. MANOHAR N., ADVOCATE (ABSNET)) And:
M/S HANJI & CO INDIAN OIL DEALERS AJJAMPURA ROAD, HOSADURGA, CHITRADURGA DIST. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR HANJI S. APPAJI.
` ... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.08.2015 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 33/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ITINERATE COUR, C.N. HALLI, DISMISISNG THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.01.2014 PASSED IN OS. NO. 181/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 16.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting two weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr