M Das @ Thomas vs The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer And Others

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.09.2017 kas To

1. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Salem, Salem District.

2. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Salem, Salem District.

W.P.No.38564 of 2005