Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M Balakrishnan vs The Inspector General Of Registration Santhome Chennai 600 028 2 District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District 3 Seibun Bei 4 Syed Jahangir ,The District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District 3 Seibun Bei 4 Syed Jahangir

Madras High Court|19 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.06.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.15322 of 2017 M.Balakrishnan ... Petitioner v.
1 The Inspector General of Registration Santhome Chennai-600 028
2 The District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District
3 Seibun Bei
4 Syed Jahangir ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamu directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petition/representation dated 17.04.2017 filed by the petitioner, within a reasonable time as this Court deem fit and proper.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai Spl. Govt. Pleader - for R1 & R2 ORDER The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2017.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2017 the second respondent has not considered the same yet.
3. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader, taking notice for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the second respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the respondents 3 and 4.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2017 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the respondents 3 and 4, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Index: Yes/No Rj To
1 The Inspector General of Registration Santhome Chennai-600 028
2 The District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District 19.06.2017 M.DURAISWAMY,J.
Rj W.P.No.15322 of 2017 19.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M Balakrishnan vs The Inspector General Of Registration Santhome Chennai 600 028 2 District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District 3 Seibun Bei 4 Syed Jahangir ,The District Registrar Kallakuruchi Registration District Kallakuruchi Villupuram District 3 Seibun Bei 4 Syed Jahangir

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 June, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy