IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.32624 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI.M.B.ASHRAF, S/O.BAVU BERI, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O.HITTALUMANE, MULLUVAPATNA, ARALA VILLAGE, BANTAWALA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA.
... PETITIONER (BY SMT.SUMANGALA.A.SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD., GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDDI BHAVAN, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 009.
2. K.S.PATIL, S/O.SHIVANNA GOWDA, R/O C/O H.B.KATTANNAVAR, BHARGAV NILAY, 4TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, C.B.NAGAR, DHARWAD – 580 007.
3. SHRI.M.RAVI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KRIDL, 2ND MAIN ROAD, II STAGE, KUDA BADAVANE, TAMAK, KOLAR - 563 101.
... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 7.1.2018 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Smt. Sumangala A. Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Taking into account the order which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 07.01.2018 vide Annexure-E.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 07.01.2018 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. In view of the submission made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Mds/-
Sd/- JUDGE