Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M Azeem Shahid B Mulla vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.38902/2018 (S- RES) BETWEEN:
M.AZEEM SHAHID B MULLA, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI.B.C.MULLA, ADDRESSED AT: NO.57, 3RD CROSS, CHITRA LAYOUT, ATTUR, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE – 560 064.
REPRESENTED BY SRI.MANJUNATH GOWDA & ASSOCIATES, NO.39/2, ASVNV BHAVAN, CHAMBER NO.71, 6TH FLOOR, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009.
.. PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATHA B.V., ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI – 580 020.
2. CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, HEAD QUARTERS, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI – 580 020.
3. CHIEF MEDICAL DIRECTOR, CENTRAL HOSPITAL (MEDICAL BRANCH), SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI – 580 020.
4. CHIEF HEALTH DIRECTOR, CENTRAL HOSPITAL (MEDICAL BRANCH), SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, GADAG ROAD, HUBLI – 580 020.
5. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAILWAY BOARD, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
.. RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY THE DIRECTION GIVEN BY THE HON’BLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL/BANGALORE BENCH WHICH WILL MEET THE PETITIONER’S REQUEST AND HE WILL JOIN RAILWAYS AS OFFERED BY THE LETTER DATED 25.06.2015 ISSUED BY FAO AND CAO, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND TO DECIDE BASED ON THE RAILWAY BOARD LETTER DATED 09.02.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-J TO ISSUE AN APPOINTMENT ORDER AS OFFERED BY FA & CAO/SWR, ALTERNATIVELY TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONGIVEN IN RAILWAY BOARD LETTER DATED 08.01.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-E ISSUED BY JOINT DIRECTOR (HEALTH) RAILWAY BOARD, AND TO ISSUE APPOINTMENT ORDER ACCORDINGLY.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner even in the second call. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE PKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M Azeem Shahid B Mulla vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 October, 2019
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar