HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.592 of 2014 Date:03.07.2014 Between:
M.A.Moiz Abbasi, S/o Late Abdul Hai Abbasi And:
Shaik Naseem Banu, W/o Late Usman ……Appellant ..…Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan Counsel for the respondent: ---
The Court made the following:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.592 of 2014
JUDGMENT:
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of order, dated 18.11.2013, in I.A.No.875 of 2013 in O.S.No.524 of 2013 on the file of the learned Special Sessions Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989-cum- Additional District and Sessions Judge at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
I have heard Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.
The appellant pleaded that the suit schedule plot originally belonged to the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Limited, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District; that the said plot was allotted to one Syed Mubasheeruddin Ahmed in the year 1982-83 under physically handicapped quota; that the said allottee, who was a polio patient and was in need of money, sold the said plot to the appellant under registered sale deed, dated 24.07.2012; that as the respondent was in physical possession of the vacant property, the appellant demanded her to vacate the same; and that as, the respondent along with her husband threatened the appellant of causing physical harm, he has filed O.S.No.524 of 2013 for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule property. The appellant also filed I.A.No.875 of 2013 in the said suit for temporary injunction restraining the respondent from alienating the suit schedule property to third parties till the disposal of the suit. The lower Court by the order under appeal has dismissed the said application.
After hearing Sri Nazir Ahmed, Khan, the learned counsel for the appellant, I am of the opinion that the order passed by the lower Court does not warrant interference by this Court for the reason that in the event of the appellant succeeding in the suit, the alienations, if any, made during the pendency of the suit will be hit by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the same will be void ab initio.
In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
As a sequel to dismissal of the appeal, CMAMP.No.867 of 2014 is dismissed as infructuous.
03rd July, 2014 DR
JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY