Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Luxmi Narain vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4433 of 2013 Petitioner :- Luxmi Narain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhriguramji Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amrit Lal Yadav,S.M. Shukla,Shrawan Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal,J.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition, however, Sri Shrawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Raghvendra Dwivedi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent are present.
On the matter being taken up today, Sri Shrawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, on instructions, submits that the demand notice issued against the petitioner has already been withdrawn and, as such, present writ petition rendered itself infructuous.
In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019
Shekhar [Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.] [Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Luxmi Narain vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
Advocates
  • Bhriguramji Pandey