Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Lucknow Sitapur Expressway ... vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Deptt. Of ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Rajesh Chandra,J.
These two writ petitions have been filed challenging the order passed by Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax Division-3, Noida dated 29.05.2010 pertaining to assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 respective enclosed as annexure no. 1 to the writ petitions, separately.
Under the impugned orders the petitioners have been held responsible for non-deduction and deposit of T.D.S. under Section 34 (6) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 on the payment made towards work contract to D.S.C. Ltd., Noida. The petitioners have also been directed to pay penalty for violation of Section 34 (1) and 34 (6) of the Act, 2008.
The orders are being challenged before this Court basically on the ground that the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 itself has been enforced on 01.01.2008 while the notification for deduction and deposit of VAT at the rate of 4% on the payments made towards work contract under Section 34 has been issued only on 04.05.2008 which has been made effective from 4th March, 2008.
It is contended that the responsibility of deduction of T.D.S. on payments made towards work contract (even if assumed to be applicable in the case of the petitioner) would arise only for a period subsequent to the enforcement of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 and issuance of the notification dated 04.05.2008 with effect from 4th March, 2008.
It is, submitted that neither any Value Added Tax was liable to be deducted by the petitioner nor any penalty can be imposed for non- deduction and non-deposit thereof.
It is, therefore, contended that the impugned order of the Deputy Commissioner is wholly without jurisdiction. The provisions of Value Added Tax Act, 2008 are not prospective in nature and any transaction entered into in terms of work contract prior to the aforesaid date and enforcement of the provision is not covered.
Having heard counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel, we are of the opinion that the matter does require enquiry by this Court. The applicability of Value Added Tax Act, 2008 itself is being questioned.
Standing counsel prays for and is granted for three weeks time to file counter affidavit.
List on 19th July, 2010 before appropriate Bench.
Till the next date of listing operation of the impugned order dated 29.05.2010, in so far as it pertains to the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 23.6.2010 M/A.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Lucknow Sitapur Expressway ... vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Deptt. Of ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 June, 2010