Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S. Lucas Tvs Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner [Ct

Madras High Court|24 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. On the first date of hearing, I had passed the following order: ...2.Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner says that the impugned order dated 24.01.2017, has been passed by the Officer of the Enforcement Wing, without an assessment order being passed in the matter.
3.It is the submission of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the alleged defects found during VAT inspection cannot become the basis of tax liability, without the Department going through the process of assessment.
4.Issue notice. Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.1.Learned counsel says that he will revert with instructions in the matter or else will file a counter affidavit, before the next date of hearing.
5.I must indicate herein that Mr.Annamalai, has submitted before me that what has been stated as tax liability is not a demand but only an intimation.
6.Prima facie, in my view, such communication cannot be served by officers of the Enforcement Wing on the petitioner. However, this Court, will await the instructions, that Mr.Annamalai may receive, in this behalf, from the department.
7.Re-notify on 24.02.2017.
8.In the meanwhile, the operation of the impugned order dated 24.01.2017, is stayed....
2. Mr. Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader, today, has reverted with the instructions that the impugned order is only an intimation and no order of assessment has been passed in the matter.
3. Accordingly, I have no hesitation in setting aside the impugned order. The respondent, however, will have the liberty to proceed hereafter with the petitioner, in accordance with law. 3.1 In fine, the writ petition is allowed as above.
3.2 Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. 3.3 However, there shall be no order as to costs.
24-02-2017 Note: Issue order copy on 16-02-2017 glp To
1. The Deputy Commissioner [CT] Enforcement (Central) No.1,Greams Road Chennai -600 006
2. The Assistant Commissioner [CT] Anna Salai II Assessment Circle Chennai RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
glp W.P.No.3388 of 2017 24-02-2017 http://judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S. Lucas Tvs Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner [Ct

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 February, 2017