Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

L.Sankaralingam vs The Joint Registrar

Madras High Court|21 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2.This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned order of termination dated 05.07.2017. Interalia, the respondents have miserably failed to follow the Principles of Natural Justice before passing the final order imposing a major punishment of termination from service and that without holding any enquiry in the manner known to law. The member of the second respondent society cannot be dismissed or terminated or removed without any proper enquiry.
3.The petitioner was appointed as Packer on 05.03.1987 in the second respondent Society, Sivagangai District and he was also promoted as Office Assistant on 29.05.1987. Subsequently, the petitioner was further promoted to the post of Salesman in Textile Sector on 31.12.2001 and his services were also regularized by the Joint Director of Cooperative Societies, Sivagangai vide his proceedings in R.C.No.1426/2007/SF dated 20.09.2007. The petitioner has completed thirty years of service. Under such circumstances, the petitioner was issued with a show cause notice alleging that the petitioner has misbehaved with the office bearers of the respondent society in the presence of the higher authorities and finally they passed the impugned order of termination dated 05.07.2017, wherein several irrelevant allegations were made against the petitioner and also no charge memo has been issued to the petitioner.
4.It is at this stage, this Court directed the learned Additional Government Pleader to get instructions as to whether the claim of the petitioner that without holding enquiry, the impugned order of termination has been passed is correct.
5.Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents on instructions fairly submitted that no enquiry has been conducted.
6.Placing on record the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this Court finds fault with the impugned order of termination. Moreover, the petitioner who has rendered thirty years of service from 05.03.1987, cannot be sent out unceremoniously, more particularly, without holding any enquiry on the mere allegations levelled against the petitioner. Accordingly, the impugned order of termination is set aside and the respondents are directed to take the petitioner back into service. It is needless to mention that it is the duty of the respondents to decide as to whether they shall proceed against afresh after issuing notice to the petitioner or not. Liberty is also given thereto.
7.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
To
1.The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Society, Sivagangai.
2.The President, N.N.628, Nattarasankottai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Nattarasankottai, Sivagangai District.
3.The President, Co-operative Credit Society, Nattarasankottai, Sivagangai District.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

L.Sankaralingam vs The Joint Registrar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2017