Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49798 of 2021 Applicant :- Lokendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- M.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Lokendra in connection with Case Crime No.199 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 354, 304, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Gabhana, district Aligarh.
The first information report of this incident was lodged by the complainant against six persons. It was alleged in the first information report that on 15.07.2021 at about 00.30 hrs. complainant has raised objected on the dancing in the marriage going on in the house of Bhura Singh, the named persons abused them and fired upon the complainant's son Aman, who is aged about 16 years.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that co-accused Kallu @ Ranveer has been admitted to the concession of bail by another Bench of this Court by order dated 14.12.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.47062 of 2021, photocopy whereof supplied by learned counsel for the applicant has been perused by the Court, is taken on record and role assigned to applicant is similar to role of other co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail. He claims parity. He submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 19.07.2021, hence he is entitled to be released on bail and he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea. However, learned A.G.A. does not dispute the factum of parity.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, submission of learned counsel for the parties, considering the law laid down in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018 (3), SCC, 2 and also the fact that aforesaid co-accused has been admitted to the concession of bail by this Court, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Lokendra involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;
v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 R./