Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Lokesh Sharma And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23039 of 2018 Petitioner :- Lokesh Sharma And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners and with further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 03.08.2018 registered as case crime no. 489 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Khair, District -Aligarh.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners who are real brothers, uncle and mother of co-accused Kapil Sharma with whom the daughter of respondent no. 3 has eloped have been falsely implicated in the present case by the respondent no. 3. It is further submitted that on the basis of allegations made in the F.I.R. the role of petitioners is clearly distinguishable from that of co-accused Kapil Sharma. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R., no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity and hence the impugned FIR qua petitioners is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned A.G.A. submitted that from the perusal of the impugned FIR and on the basis of the allegation made therein, it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is disclosed against the petitioners. As far as the question of lack of evidence in support of the allegation made in the impugned FIR is concerned the same shall be collected during investigation and the impugned FIR is not liable to be quashed on the basis of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned FIR, we are not inclined to quash the same.
However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances, we direct that investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioners shall not be arrested till the submission of police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. subject to their extending full co-operation during investigation.
With the aforesaid direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lokesh Sharma And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Bala Krishna Narayana
Advocates
  • Manish Kumar Dwivedi