Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that this is a case of circumstantial evidence and the deceased disappeared on 26.3.2009 and the name of the applicant surfaced after four months on 15.7.2009 on the basis of his extra judicial confession and there is no recovery against the applicant.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute this position.
Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Lokesh Nishad, involved in Case Crime No. 99/2009, under sections 302, 201 & 394 I.P.C., Police Station Achnera, district Agra, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Order Date :- 1.2.2010 HSM