Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that from the allegations made in the application filed by the revisionist under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C, commission of cognizable offence by the O.P. Nos. 2 to 5 was disclosed and hence the Court below has committed a patent error of law in rejecting the revisionist's application.
After having examined the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the impugned order as well as other materials brought on record, I do not find that the impugned order suffers from any illegality or infirmity warranting any interference by this Court. The Court below has in the impugned order given cogent reasons for rejecting the application filed by the revisionist under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
This application in revision lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is given to the revisionist to file a complaint under Section 190(1)(a)/200 Cr.P.C.
This application in revision lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.2.2011 arun