IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.58003/2017 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN:
LOHIT TALAVAR S/O MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.29 MAGADI ROAD 1ST CROSS, VINNY COLONY BANGALORE 560 023 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADV. [NO REPRESENTATION]) AND:
1. KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI 580 025 REP BY ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SHESHADRIPURAM LAW COLLEGE SHESHADRIPRAM BANGALORE 560 020 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANAPATHI BHAT VAJRALLI, ADV. FOR R1; R2-SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-D DTD:16.12.2017 AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO TAKE UP THE EXAMINATION SCHEDULED IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER-2017.
2 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRILIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 would submit that the petition has become infructuous. The said submission is placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to seek for revival of the petition, if the petition requires to be considered on merits.
Sd/- JUDGE PL*