Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Lite-On Mobile India P Ltd vs Commercial Tax Officer

Madras High Court|20 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1.Issue Notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of learned counsel for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2.This writ petition is directed against the assessment order dated 24.10.2016 and the revision order dated 16.12.2016.
3.The principal grievance of the petitioner is that while passing the order in revision i.e., 16.12.2016, only one facet was considered, that is, the issue related to inter-state sales.
3.1.It is, thus, the petitioner's case that since the original declarations in Form 'C' were submitted, necessary adjustment was made while passing the order-in-revision. The petitioner, however, is aggrieved, according to the learned counsel, on account of the fact that documents concerning to export sales were not taken into account by the respondent while passing the order-in-revision.
4.The petitioner, draws my attention to the communication dated 21.12.2016, whereby, the relevant invoices, shipping bills and FIRC were, purportedly, filed with the respondent.
5.Mr.K.Venkatesh, who appears for the respondent says that a direction could be issued to the respondent to consider the said documents, if the same, as contended stand filed with the respondent.
6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to treat the communication dated 21.12.2016 as the petition under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The respondent after affording a hearing to the petitioner's authorised representative, shall pass an order qua, the said representation, which, as indicated above will be treated as petition under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
6.1.For this purpose, the authorised representative of the petitioner will appear before the respondent on 08.02.2017 at 11.00 a.m. In case the said date is not convenient to the respondent, a fresh date will be given in the matter, which will be proximate to the date fixed above. The authorised representative of the petitioner shall produce all relevant documents in original, if not already filed, before the respondent at the time of hearing.
6.2.Needless to say, the respondent, after hearing the petitioner's authorised representative and after taking into account the relied upon documents, shall pass a speaking order. Pending culmination of the aforesaid exercise, no coercive measures will be taken against the petitioner.
7.Consequently, the connected pending application is also closed. No costs.
20.01.2017 pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No Note: Issue order copy on 23.01.2017 To The Commercial Tax Officer, Egmore Assessment Circle, 88, Mayor Ramanathan Road, Chetpet, Chennai  600 031.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
pri W.P.No.1470 of 2017 And W.M.P.No.1381 of 2017 20.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lite-On Mobile India P Ltd vs Commercial Tax Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 January, 2017