The petitioner has approached this Court with the folowing prayers:
“i) call for the records leading to Ext.P3 series, scrutinize and quash the same as illegal and unsustainable
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing the 2nd respondent to produce the documents relating to the chitty transactions, if any, in the name of the petitioner.
iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 representation in accordance with law within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court; and
iv) grant such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.”
2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of W.P.(C)No.29120 OF 2014 2 the petitioner has already been projected by way of Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent/Managing Director, KSFE and that the only relief pressed before this Court is for issuance of a direction to the first respondent to consider and finalise Ext.P4 within a reasonable time.
3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents as well.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent/Managing Director to consider and finalise Ext. P4 at the earliest, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance till then.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk