IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P. NO. 15535/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. LINGAMMA W/O H R KOTEKALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O HALETHIMMANAHALLI PURAVARA HOBLI MADHUGIRI TLAUK-572132 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAGANGADHAR G S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. KOTAMMA W/O LATE B N VEERANAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O HALATHIMMANAHALLI PURAVARA HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK-572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI B V RAMAIAH S/O LATE B N VEERANAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O BHAKTHARAHALLI VILALGE KASAB HOBLI KORATAGERE TLAUK-572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI NAGABHUSHANA S/O LATE B N VEERANAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE, NOW WORKING AT SIDDAGANGA ELEMENTARY MIDDLE SCHOOL, B H ROAD-572101, TUMKUR.
4. SRI B N VIJAYAKUMAR S/O LATE B N VEERANAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O HALATHIMMANAHALLI PURAVARA HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK-572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
5. SMT MUDDANAGAMMA W/O ASWATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O JADEGONDANAHALLI KASAB HOBLI-572132 MADHUGIRI TALUK.
6. SMT SIDDAGANGAMMA W/O B N GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING BEHIND T.V.V. COLLEGE, MADHUGIRI – HINDUPUR ROAD-572132 MADHUGIRI.
7. SMT. RAJAMMA W/O RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O HALATHIMMANAHALLI PURAVARA HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK-572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
8. SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE KASAB HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK-572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI IN O.S.NO.186/2011 DTD:15.3.2017 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AS THE SAME ARE IMPUGNED PREVERSE, CAPRICIOUS AND LIABLE TO THE SET ASIDE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to raise the grounds raised in the present writ petition in the appeal in the event of petitioner not succeeding before trial Court. Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as sought for by petitioner is granted.
*sp SD/- JUDGE