Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Lekhraj And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 31
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12448 of 2018 Applicant :- Lekhraj And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijaya Shankar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the records.
The applicants, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the summoning order dated 02.11.2017 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 668 of 2017 (Savitri Vs. Lekhraj) under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Shahi, district Bareilly.
The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. Learned counsel pointed out towards certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application by contending that all the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Considered the rival submissions made by the parties.
The submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants calls for adjudication on pure questions of fact, which may be adequately adjudicated upon only by the trial court and while doing so even the submissions made on points of law can also be more appropriately gone into by the trial court in this case.
At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192, Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 and the recent being A.R.C.J. Vs. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd. (2016) 1 SCC 348. Therefore, this Court does not deem it proper and cannot be persuaded to have a pre-trial before the actual trial begins. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got a right of discharge by moving a proper application for the said purpose before the trial court and they are free to make all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court including those which have been canvassed by her before this Court in this application.
Accordingly the prayer for quashing the impugned summoning order and entire proceedings is refused.
At this juncture learned counsel for the applicants prayed that the applicants are ready to surrender before the court below, but he prays that a time of 30 days only be granted for such purpose. Prayer has also been made to direct the Court below to dispose of the bail applications of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with the law as laid down by this Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290 affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
Learned AGA has no objection against the aforesaid prayer.
As the law laid down in both the aforesaid cases, should be complied with in letter and spirit, by all courts, it is expected from the trial court that in case the applicants surrender before it within 30 days from today and apply for bail it will decide their bail applications in wake of the law laid down by this Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290 and affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
For a period of 30 days from today, which shall not be extended any further in any case, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, in the above mentioned case.
With the aforesaid directions this application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 S.B.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lekhraj And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • S Vijay Lakshmi
Advocates
  • Vijaya Shankar Shukla