Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Leeladhar And Others vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Home ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
Learned A.G.A. has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Issue notice to respondent no. 3.
Each one of the respondent is accorded eight weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks. List thereafter.
It has been contended on behalf of the petitioners that in the present case without there been any lawful foundation and basis, allegations have been levelled for demand of dowry, whereas, at no point of time, any demand of dowry whatsoever has been made. Petitioners submit that entire family has been sought to be harassed and victimized including ladies, when marriage was not finalized.
Prima facie arguments advanced, requires consideration by this court. Consequently, till the next date of listing or till submission of the report under Section 173 (2) Cr. P.C. whichever is earlier, petitioners shall not be arrested in Case Crime No. 606 of 2010, under Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Swar, District Rampur, subject to condition that petitioners shall extend all possible co-operation with the on going investigation. Order Date :- 22.6.2010 T.S.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Leeladhar And Others vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Home ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2010