Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Laxmikant Gupta vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31693 of 2018 Applicant :- Laxmikant Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras has sent the alleged matter at Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Hathras and as per order sheet dated 29.07.2017 itself shows both the parties have appeared before the said centre and they have made request and want one week time for considering compromise, as prayed by them centre was fixed the next date 08.08.2017 and on 08.08.2017 the informant was specifically denied to live with the applicant. A copy of the order sheet of the Mediation Centre has been annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is also submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 23.07.2018. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Laxmikant Gupta involved in Case Crime No. 031 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Hathras be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Laxmikant Gupta vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi