Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Lav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53103 of 2019 Applicant :- Lav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Sadab Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No.449 of 2019, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Bhognipur, District Kanpur Dehat, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is submitted that on 08.09.2019, FIR under section 392 I.P.C. has been lodged against unknown person. Thereafter on 06.09.2019, seven persons including the present applicant were apprehended by the police and from the possession of applicant, one iron rod/pipe was recovered. Pursuant to said recovery, police has implicated applicant alongwith other co-accused in Case Crime No.432 of 2019, under sections 399, 402 I.P.C., in which the applicant has been granted bail by order dated 29.11.2019 in Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.52937 of 2019. Applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 06.09.2019. Learned counsel for the applicant lastly submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the early disposal of the case.
Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the application for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Lav, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.
ii) The applicant will abide the orders of the court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. It is further clarified that the trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 SKD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Mohammad Sadab Khan