Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52136 of 2019 Applicant :- Lallu @ Lal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Priyanka Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dinesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel on behalf of the complainant is taken on record.
Heard Ms. Priyanka Devi, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accused-applicant, Lallu @ Lal Singh, who is involved in Case Crime No.115 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 308, 304 and 504 I.P.C., P.S.-Srinagar, District-Mahoba.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Chargesheet has been submitted on 19.11.2019. The applicant has no previous criminal history as stated in para-17 of the bail application, he is not likely to abscond. The applicant is in jail since 30.08.2019.
She further submitted that the deceased sustained two injuries from blunt object whereas in the F.I.R. applicant has been shown as armed with lathi. Co-accused Hargovind has been shown as armed with axe. There is no injury of axe on the body of the deceased. Co-accused Hargoind has already been granted bail vide order dated 14.11.2019 passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.46936 of 2019.
Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of State- respondent vehemently opposed the bail application and not contradicted the ground of parity.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let applicant, Lallu @ Lal Singh, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(i). The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence, if the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(ii). The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(iii). In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Asha