Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Lallan Ram vs U P Rajya Sugar Cropn Ltd & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32308 of 2001 Petitioner :- Lallan Ram Respondent :- U.P. Rajya Sugar Cropn. Ltd. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- R.K. Srivastava,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
"(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to command the respondent to pay all arrears to the petitioner.
(ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to decide his representation dated 18.9.200, 18.5.2001 and 21.8.2001 to Annexure No. 6, 7 and 8 is attached to the writ petition."
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Sri B.K.S. Raghuvanshi, Advocate holding brief of Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent, is present.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Lallan Ram vs U P Rajya Sugar Cropn Ltd & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar